For those of us who live and breathe the rarified vapors of
technology based automation, it&rsquos pretty hard to fathom how
life existed without electronic automation. Yet, it has been a short
30 years since the venerable PLC became anything more than a novelty
outside of the Big 3 in Detroit. Sometime in the late 1970s,
microprocessors changed our lives forever. Since those early days, the
power of these tiny chips forever changed the way we think about
manufacturing.
From no-touch sensors to motor
temperature monitors and back again to arch-flash safety devices,
microprocessors have infiltrated every part of the automation manufacturer
world. In recent years, communication capability and stand-alone
electronic intelligence has pushed its way into all reaches of
&ldquothings automatic.&rdquo Microprocessor-enabled valves
control liquid flow based on the input of electronic float
switches. The possibilities seem limitless and the market reflects
that fact.
Today, the size of the automation
market has grown so vast, it is difficult to measure. The very
definition of the market is openly argued. And, each individual
segment of that automation market becomes exponentially harder to
measure and define. To illustrate this point, let&rsquos talk
about the two main disciplines of the automation market: discrete
automation and process automation.
Discrete
automation is characterized by production of individual
parts. Automobile, light bulb and electronic manufacture can be thought
of as discrete automation. Process automation is characterized by the
production of a fluid or gas. Oil refineries use process
automation. But what kind of manufacturing is tire making &ndash
where process and discrete assembly steps are combined? The
definitions get cloudy very fast.
Let&rsquos
just say the world of automation&mdashboth discrete and
process&mdashis huge. A two-year-old news release from the ARC
Advisory Group projected the process automation side of the market
alone to be $79 billion by 2010 (and that is just half of the
equation). Cheap electronics, new manufacturing techniques and the
competitive pressures of the world market keep the automation train
rolling along &ndash even in poor economic conditions.
And at the same time...
At the same time these techno-electronic breakthroughs were manifesting themselves in the automation products
business, the world of business was in flux. The last quarter of the
twentieth century brought a fundamental shift in the way business is
conducted. During the early stages of the shift, automation
breakthroughs allowed for a reduction in manufacturing labor. Later
improvements in white collar productivity allowed for a similar
reduction in office administrative employees. But, there was more
ahead.
Changes in world economic conditions
brought right-sizing, outsourcing and professional service
contracts. To illustrate this point, we need only look at the typical
plant engineering department of the 1970&rsquos. The department
was a self-contained group with resident electrical, mechanical and
civil engineers on staff. It was not uncommon for these departments to
number in the hundreds. During the 1980&rsquos, this changed
dramatically. Entire departments were re-engineered to a handful of
generalists - more project managers than engineers.
Consolidation
hit the world of manufacturing in 1980&rsquos. Government figures
indicate 1989 was the top merger year. In the automotive industry
alone, the number of companies dealing as suppliers to the Big 3
automakers dropped from 30,000+ in 1988 to less than 8,000 in
1999. These same consolidations affected the companies&rsquo
distributors which did business across North America. These numbers
from Thomas Financial Securities Data (Mulligan 1999) illustrate the
changes, which surely would have affected wholesale distribution during
these times.
Mergers in Billions of Dollars in Business
Business Services
|
63 Billion
|
Communications Equipment
|
31 Billion
|
Machinery
|
26 Billion
|
Chemicals
|
25 Billion
|
Drugs
|
24 Billion
|
Instrumentation
|
23 Billion
|
Electronics
|
18 Billion
|
Distributors
from all lines of trade were affected by this consolidation. Nowhere
was this consolidation felt more than in those supplying products into
the industrial manufacturing sphere.
Finger pointing&hellip
During the early days of automation, plant engineering departments served the role of integrator. Engineering departments provided detailed specifications to suppliers of mechanical, electrical, hydraulic and other components. The distributor answered specification questions, helped anticipate spare part needs and provided timely delivery. The engineering group did the rest.
As
the 1980&rsquos unfolded, the newly downsized engineering
departments found they could no longer handle the same
workload. Opportunistic distributors added technical expertise to
support their &ldquomain line&rdquo products. But, new
developments in business practices continued to affect the flow of
products and expertise.
Economic pressures,
driven by downturns in the economy, forced many major customers to
look at the advantages of single sourcing products. No longer were
there three suppliers from each of the main lines of trade. Instead,
customers began to consolidate their purchases. With a single
distributor serving each of the supply disciplines, vendor lists were
dramatically trimmed. But, problems persisted.
The
advancement of microprocessor controlled communications created
issues when products which were supposed to work together
didn&rsquot. Many end customers felt as though they were left
holding the bag. The term &ldquofinger-pointing&rdquo was
coined to describe the issue. When a programmable logic controller
didn&rsquot communicate with an intelligent valve or an electric
motor burned up when &ldquoproperly&rdquo applied with a
variable frequency drive, the customer felt disenfranchised and lost.
Distributors began to morph&hellip
Distributors
live and die based on their ability to add value to their end
customers. Many distributors saw the &ldquofinger-pointing&rdquo
phenomenon as an opportunity. And, a few began to refocus their
product offerings. The addition of complimentary products provided
value (single source supply & no finger-pointing). The newly
refocused products drove competitive differentiation for the
distributor in the market.
As distributors
looked for ways to expand their business, selling additional products
to a core group of loyal customers made great sense. Selling products
which complimented their existing product mix provided value for the
customer. Often, the new products slowly moved the distributor away
from their historical past.
The changing world of motion control&hellip
Nowhere
is this more evident than what many now call &ldquomotion
control.&rdquo Long before the world of electronic automation,
precise motion control has been around since the early days of the
industrial age. For instance, the tolerances required in gun
manufacture developed in the late 1800&rsquos were roughly
equivalent to those being used today. The precise motion control used
for automobiles, jet engines and even the space orbiters was possible
long before modern motion control techniques were developed.
Motion
control as we know it today combines the technologies of mechanical,
pneumatic, hydraulic and electronic components. Because there is no
scholarly definition for motion control today, allow me to provide
one.
&ldquoMotion control: The hardware, software and human interface devices required to precisely control speed, acceleration-deceleration, position or orientation. The system must be programmable and capable of changing aspects of the control to match operating parameters.&rdquo
Is
it any wonder that so many of today&rsquos leading distributors
provide value in the motion control arena? Power transmission
distributors, electrical distributors, fluid power distributors and
automation solution providers all compete for a role in this
market. Many times, the distributor with the greatest expertise has a historical
background in a completely different technology. Nowhere is this more
evident than those members of the Power Transmission Distributors
Association (PTDA).
While
the name conjures up mental pictures of gears, belts and bearings,
the members of PTDA exemplify this migration of technologies. Case in
point, a recent informal survey conducted by River Heights Consulting
of Davenport, Iowa discovered that members of PTDA are responsible for
over $800 million of the new motion control business.
One
such member of PTDA is Eastern Bearings, Inc. of Waltham, MA. Eastern
Bearings employs value-add specialists in motion control and a number
of other specialized technologies. During a project at a waste
handing facility in Maine, Eastern Bearings&rsquo motion specialist
proposed a new motion control system which combined technologies from
multiple manufactures to provide a crane system control which
simplified maintenance and reduced operating cost. The integrated
system was engineered and manufactured &ldquoin
house&rdquo. It included detailed configured HMI screens and
automated troubleshooting aids. Did all this come from a
&ldquobearing&rdquo supplier? No, it came from a 45-year old
company with a proud history that happened to start off in the bearing
business.
Everybody came from somewhere...
Today
and in the future, there will be no electrical supplier, no hydraulic
supplier, no mechanical suppler instead, there will be automation
solution providers. Names continue, often carrying the proud mantra of
the past. In the 1930&rsquos, bluesman Willie Dixon penned the
song, &ldquoYou Can&rsquot Judge a Book by Its
Cover.&rdquo A modern version might be, &ldquoYou
Can&rsquot Judge a Distributor by the Product in Its Name.&rdquo
Remember
our first point all of this automation market (we are so fond of)
didn&rsquot exist just 40 years ago. Everybody came from
someplace. Don&rsquot let supplier names fool you.
没有评论:
发表评论